T100 parent-child children's clothing: parent-child education "Kong Rongrang pear" how to become a negative teaching material in the United States

T100 parent-child children's clothing: parent-child education "Kong Rongrang pear" how to become a negative teaching material in the United States

Teacher: Kong Rong was smart and ready to learn when he was a child. He was able to memorize many poems when he was four years old. According to reports, his father's friend brought a plate of pears, and his father told Kong Rong to distribute it to his brothers. Kong Rong picked the smallest pear for himself, and the rest was distributed to his brothers in the order of their youngest son. Kong Rong said: " When I was young, I should eat small pears, but my big ones should be given to my brothers.” After listening to his praise, the father continued to ask, “What kind of pear is younger than you if your brother is younger than you?” Kong Rong said: “Because my brother is younger than me. It's small, so I should let him." How do you see this?

Student: Why did my father's friend give Kong Rongjia a pear?

Teacher: As a gift.

Student: Since it is a good gift, it must be a good pear. Why is it obvious that there is something big or small, can it not be generally big?

teacher:……

Student: Since the pears are big or small, why does Daddy have to go for the four-year-old Kong Rong? What if the points are not fair? Will the pear that has gone out again come back?

teacher:……

Students: Why do you have to give each person to eat, who wants to eat and who can get it by themselves?

Teacher: That may not be fair.

Student: But Kong Rong is not necessarily fair in this point. All the brothers have to get pears according to Kong Rong's preferences. Their chances of being taken away are deprived. The brothers who share the biggest pear may not even like pears.

Teacher: You are right. This story is based on the assumption that everyone likes to eat pears.

Student: Why did Rong Rong implement contradictory and absolutely opposite standards for his brother and younger brother? Doesn’t he have a fixed principle of doing things?

Teacher: He is showing humility.

Student: He can only show his humility and give himself a minimum. Why doesn't he show other brothers a chance to show humility?

Teacher: What do you think about Kong Rong?

Student: I don't like Kong Rong. He did it unfairly to others and deprived other brothers of the opportunity to choose and perform.

Student: I think Kong Rong is not honest.

Teacher: Why?

Student: This matter is somewhat contradictory. Kong Rong may not have liked to eat a pear to give himself a minimum, but he would not like to eat. He should just say that it is hypocritical to make a bunch of high-sounding reasons. In turn, if he likes to eat pears, then giving big ones to others is also a matter of duplicity. He likes to admit that he is brave.

Student: I also don't like Kong Rong's father.

Teacher: Why?

Student: He is irresponsible. He has four-year-old Rongrong Rong who has no ability to act and he is not a non-concept. The behavior of Kong Rongfen pears is subjective and arbitrary but he is praised by his father.

Teacher: ...

Student: This story is not good. Encourage subjective judgment and deprivation of democracy. This kind of distorted desire to win praise is an unhealthy psychological behavior.

Teacher: What would you do if you were Rong Rong?

Student: Put the pear on the table. Whoever eats it will get it.

Reflections: A model of Chinese Confucianism has become a model of subjective assertion, trampling on equality, and false feelings in the United States. Reflecting on disciplined education, we should pay more attention to children’s personality while cultivating “obedient” students. Development should encourage children to understand the causes and consequences of the analysis.

This article comes from the web - Recommend to a friend

T100 parent-child children's clothing: parent-child education "Kong Rongrang pear" how to become a negative teaching material in the United States